Because I am not now in a position to build from scratch, I posed a question about a commercial corexy that could be improved. I was thinking along the lines of the Ender 3, where for not a lot of money, but a fair amount of time, people get a pretty good machine. I hadn't appreciated that there was such room for poor implementation of the corexy concept.
I wonder about a kit as the better high-value approach.
The SecKit seems pretty good, as does the Railcore, but I have not yet developed the intuition to critique different designs, so I am asking the experts here.
I wonder, too, what tends to become the binding constraint on higher print speeds.
Presumably, at the limit, the properties of the melted filament become the constraint?
Below that, does a smaller machine have a practical speed (mass) advantage over a larger, otherwise identical machine?
What would the speed profile curve look like as you scale up in 3 dimensions?
TIA
I wonder about a kit as the better high-value approach.
The SecKit seems pretty good, as does the Railcore, but I have not yet developed the intuition to critique different designs, so I am asking the experts here.
I wonder, too, what tends to become the binding constraint on higher print speeds.
Presumably, at the limit, the properties of the melted filament become the constraint?
Below that, does a smaller machine have a practical speed (mass) advantage over a larger, otherwise identical machine?
What would the speed profile curve look like as you scale up in 3 dimensions?
TIA
